01History
IT follows its history, not the strategy.
Services stay in-house because they have always been in-house. Others were outsourced and never questioned again.
Sourcing strategies for IT services
Outsource, bring in-house or retire? Using the double SWOT method, CorInnoHive
01History
Services stay in-house because they have always been in-house. Others were outsourced and never questioned again.
02Know-how
Strategically important services leave the company, while standard services tie up valuable internal resources.
03Skilled staff
Services are often outsourced not because it’s the best decision, but because the necessary know-how is missing.
Where you stand
In many companies, the IT landscape follows its own history more than a strategy. Services stay in-house because they have always been in-house. Others were outsourced, and by now nobody questions whether they are in good hands there.
The consequence: strategically important IT services leave the company, while standard services tie up valuable internal resources. The competitive advantage moves out, the costs stay at home. The shortage of skilled staff makes the situation worse. Services are often outsourced not because it’s the best decision, but because the necessary know-how is missing. A sourcing strategy quickly turns into a staffing strategy.
The true yardstick is: which IT services create real business value, and which are interchangeable standard services? This is exactly where many companies lack the necessary transparency. Decisions are often made on the basis of historical structures, availability or habit rather than strategic relevance. The consequence: ability to innovate moves out, know-how is lost and resources are tied up in the wrong place.
Many companies are unintentionally outsourcing their competitive advantage along with their IT.
What is it costing you?
Cost optimisation is easy. The real art is not losing any competitive advantage in the process. CorInnoHive
How we solve it
